Premier League clubs spent just 70 million pounds ($96 million) during the January transfer window as the coronavirus pandemic hit budgets — the lowest total in the winter window since 2012. The outlay was dramatically down on last season’s 230 million pound outlay, which came shortly before Covid-19 pandemic swept across Europe. The subdued transfer window, which closed late Monday, will now be followed by a period of uncertainty in the market, according to a financial expert from Deloitte.
Spending has risen steadily year on year with the exception of January 2019’s dip to 180 million, but the ongoing effects of empty stadiums and diminished broadcast revenues make it difficult to know whether the trend will resume.
Tim Bridge of Deloitte’s Sports Business Group told Britain’s Press Association news agency: “It’s probably the toughest time ever to predict what the transfer market will look like in 12 or 18 months.
“I think the way transfer departments within clubs work now, it’s often quite scientific or quite analytical and now more than ever it’s very challenging to make sure you’ve got the data correct.
“It’s also challenging to make any sorts of estimates as to what the future of the market might look like. I think it depends on a number of factors.
“Getting fans back into the stadium is essential to the business model of football clubs, and then how the commercial model reacts.”
Manchester United’s Amad Diallo, Aston Villa new boy Morgan Sanson and West Brom pair Mbaye Diagne and Robert Snodgrass were among the handful of high-profile permanent signings as teams made the decision to rely on their existing squads or relied on loans.
Liverpool borrowed much-needed defensive cover in the form of Schalke’s Ozan Kabak, along with a low-cost permanent deal for Preston’s Ben Davies, while Martin Odegaard (Arsenal) and Jean-Philippe Mateta (Crystal Palace) were other temporary arrivals.
Despite just 7 million pounds being spent on deadline day, down from 25 million a year earlier, January’s business took Premier League spending for the season to 1.4 billion pounds.
Bridge feels uncertainty will persist but that there could be beneficiaries among the reduced spending.
“It’s OK to have a period of revenue that you missed out on, but if that’s consistent over time then steadily the business model of the clubs will have to change,” he said.
“If that went to the 2021/22 season and beyond, then you would expect to see a natural shift in the transfer market.
“It’s certainly going to be an interesting couple of windows and I think in relative terms, compared to what we’ve seen previously, some clubs will feel they’ve got bargains in the transfer market.
“Whereas previously they might have had to spend upwards of 50 million pounds, a player may be available for 30-40 million pounds based on the situation at the selling club at a specific point in time. It’s one to watch with interest.”
Topics mentioned in this article